H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-1

Silvia Farina Elia and Kimiko Date Krumm are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on grass, while Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Key Biscayne fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 25, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #41 Match data
Jun 16, 1994* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Silvia Farina Elia #86 5-7 6-3 10-8 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8