H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 3-1

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 3–1 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Silvia Farina Elia #12 6-4 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #56 Match data Mar 6, 2002 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Silvia Farina Elia #14 6-4 3-6 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #46 Match data Jan 16, 2002* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Silvia Farina Elia #18 6-1 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #49 Match data Jun 21, 2001* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Lilia Osterloh #77 6-3 5-7 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #56 Match data Jun 28, 2000* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 369 312 54.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,586 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,679 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,649 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 1996 23–22 51.1% #34 1,711 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,719 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,783 0 0 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2000 17–18 48.6% #63 1,709 0 0 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2004 42–24 63.6% #20 1,769 0 3 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,642 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1989 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1994 6 7 13 46.2% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1995 7 7 14 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1996 11 10 21 52.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 13 11 24 54.2% 15 7 22 68.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 12 9 21 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2000 5 7 12 41.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 22 11 33 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2002 15 12 27 55.6% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2003 7 14 21 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2004 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2005 10 12 22 45.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 129 258 50.0% 157 110 267 58.8% 29 27 56 51.8% 54 46 100 54.0% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 33/164 of Silvia Farina Elia's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 2003 10/50 0.8 2.6 70.1% 63.9% 50.2% 57.0% 61.1% 59.7% 46.3% 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 2004 11/66 0.8 1.9 73.4% 57.3% 52.6% 60.3% 57.1% 56.1% 48.3% 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
33 2005 12/48 0.5 2.8 70.0% 59.4% 47.4% 45.1% 55.5% 55.7% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33/681 0.7 2.5 71.2% 60.0% 50.0% 53.8% 57.7% 57.0% 48.8% — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1989 1523 107.1 — — — — — +47 — 46.7% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1528 110.3 — — — — — +28 — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.17 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 1991 1590 119.1 — — — — -52 +52 — 46.3% -0.46 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — +0.60 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 1992 1578 112.3 — — — — -16 +43 — 33.3% -1.39 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.1 -0.40 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 1993 1587 115.3 — — — — -13 -10 +21 44.2% -0.48 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 -0.63 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 1994 1679 127.7 — — — — -57 -10 -47 46.6% -0.03 9–5 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 103.2 +0.22 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 1995 1650 125.3 — — — — -53 +47 -19 52.1% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 2–10 (17%) 92.8 +0.84 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 1996 1712 137.8 — — — — -18 +33 — 52.0% 0.00 7–5 (58%) 7–2 (78%) 105.7 -0.02 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 1997 1720 140.6 — — — — -7 +28 -87 45.2% -0.34 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 -1.88 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 1998 1901 156.1 — — — — -35 -31 — 54.9% +0.30 14–6 (70%) 5–5 (50%) 107.1 -5.73 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 1999 1784 146.6 — — — — +15 +17 -174 57.7% +0.55 6–11 (35%) 4–4 (50%) 90.7 -2.27 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2000 1710 130.6 — — — — +9 +70 — 47.5% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 98.3 -1.05 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2001 1768 141.2 — — — — +7 +61 -115 58.6% +0.43 19–7 (73%) 5–8 (38%) 105.4 +1.52 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2002 1746 143.3 — — — — +13 +78 -56 57.4% +0.56 12–7 (63%) 6–11 (35%) 97.8 +1.12 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 2003 1719 134.0 +2.40 +1.09 1.150 52.8% -95 +122 +158 53.4% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 97.6 -1.01 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 2004 1770 142.3 +0.56 +2.59 1.099 52.2% -28 +126 +91 58.4% +0.63 16–8 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 107.1 +0.67 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
33 2005 1643 133.1 -0.21 +3.99 1.156 53.4% -13 +219 +164 53.1% +0.30 3–7 (30%) 4–2 (67%) 95.9 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1944 143.6 +0.84 +2.64 1.135 52.8% -19 +57 +10 53.0% +0.21 122–91 (57%) 60–72 (45%) 100.6 -1.05 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.