H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-1

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 2–0 on clay, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1996 Canadian Open second round 6-3 6-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1996* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lori Mcneil #42 6-3 6-7 7-5 Silvia Farina Elia #43 Match data
Mar 30, 1995* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #51 6-3 6-1 Lori Mcneil #17 Match data
May 5, 1993* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #116 5-7 6-2 6-2 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11