H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Mary Pierce H2H: 1-5

Mary Pierce holds a 5–1 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2003 Tokyo third round 3-6 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 30, 2003* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Silvia Farina Elia #15 3-6 6-1 6-0 Mary Pierce #50 Match data
Jun 4, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mary Pierce #132 6-1 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #11 Match data
Nov 1, 1998* Luxembourg WTA 250 F Carpet Mary Pierce #8 6-0 2-0 (ret.) Silvia Farina Elia #21 Match data
Aug 28, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Pierce #10 6-2 3-0 (ret.) Silvia Farina Elia #43 Match data
Jul 11, 1992* Palermo WTA 250 SF Clay Mary Pierce #16 6-2 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #114 Match data
Apr 23, 1992* Barcelona WTA 250 R32 Clay Mary Pierce #15 6-1 6-0 Silvia Farina Elia #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —