H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvia Farina Elia vs Maureen Drake H2H: 2-0
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2003 Wimbledon second round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 55
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Silvia Farina Elia | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2002* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-2 7-5 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvia Farina Elia | Maureen Drake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |