H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Silvia Farina Elia vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-1
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2004 Roland Garros second round 6-3 3-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-3 3-6 9-7 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| May 13, 2004* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-2 7-5 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1999* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-4 6-2 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvia Farina Elia | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |