H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-5

Monica Seles holds a 5–0 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Miami fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 2002* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Monica Seles #6 7-6(4) 6-4 Silvia Farina Elia #12 Match data
Mar 12, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Monica Seles #8 6-1 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #36 Match data
Sep 2, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Monica Seles #4 6-2 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #26 Match data
Oct 25, 1998* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 QF Carpet Monica Seles #6 6-0 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #24 Match data
May 7, 1998* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Monica Seles #7 6-2 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —