H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvia Farina Elia vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-2
Patty Fendick holds a 2–1 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on clay, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Patty Fendick | 6-4 6-3 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-4 6-4 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 7-6 6-2 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvia Farina Elia | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |