H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Silvia Farina Elia vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 2-2
Silvia Farina Elia and Sabine Appelmans are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 2000 Miami second round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2000* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1997* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Silvia Farina Elia | 3-6 7-6 6-1 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1995* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-1 6-2 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1994* | Moscow | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Sabine Appelmans | 6-2 7-6 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvia Farina Elia | Sabine Appelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |