H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 4-2

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 4–2 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 2–1 on clay, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2002 Rome fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2002* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Sandrine Testud #10 3-6 6-2 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #12 Match data
Feb 3, 2002* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Silvia Farina Elia #15 6-4 6-3 Sandrine Testud #12 Match data
May 16, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #29 6-1 1-6 6-3 Sandrine Testud #21 Match data
Oct 21, 1999* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Silvia Farina Elia #25 6-3 6-4 Sandrine Testud #14 Match data
Jul 11, 1998* Prague WTA 250 QF Clay Sandrine Testud #13 2-6 6-3 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #26 Match data
Jan 10, 1998* Auckland WTA 250 SF Hard Silvia Farina Elia #42 6-2 7-6 Sandrine Testud #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —