H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-1

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on carpet, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2003 Tokyo fourth round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 31, 2003* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Tamarine Tanasugarn #31 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #15 Match data
Jun 2, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #11 6-0 7-6(1) Tamarine Tanasugarn #20 Match data
Mar 21, 2002* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Silvia Farina Elia #12 6-3 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4