H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 3-1

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 3–1 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2005 Canberra round of 32 7-6(0) 6-4.

ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 1
4 main-draw meetings
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Silvia Farina Elia #19 7-6(0) 6-4 Tatiana Panova #73 Match data Jan 13, 2005* R32 Canberra Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tatiana Panova #21 6-3 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #14 Match data Oct 10, 2002* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Silvia Farina Elia #15 6-4 7-5 Tatiana Panova #29 Match data Jan 31, 2002* R32 Pan Pacific Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Silvia Farina Elia #23 4-6 6-3 6-3 Tatiana Panova #35 Match data May 31, 2001* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 369 312 54.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,586 0 0 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,679 0 0 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,649 0 0 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0
24 1996 23–22 51.1% #34 1,711 0 0 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,719 0 0 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,783 0 0 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0
28 2000 17–18 48.6% #63 1,709 0 0 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3
32 2004 42–24 63.6% #20 1,769 0 3
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,642 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Tatiana Panova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 6 7 13 46.2% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1995 7 7 14 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 1996 11 10 21 52.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1998 13 11 24 54.2% 15 7 22 68.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 12 9 21 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2000 5 7 12 41.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 22 11 33 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2002 15 12 27 55.6% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
31 2003 7 14 21 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
32 2004 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 2005 10 12 22 45.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 129 129 258 50.0% 157 110 267 58.8% 29 27 56 51.8% 54 46 100 54.0% 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Tatiana Panova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1989 1523 107.1 +47 46.7% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.49 1994 1508 105.4 +37 33.3% -1.67 -0.36
18 1990 1528 110.3 +28 45.5% +0.09 0–1 -0.17 1995 1486 100.7 +8 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.67
19 1991 1590 119.1 -52 +52 46.3% -0.46 4–1 (80%) 1–1 +0.60 1996 1498 103.8 +10 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 +0.45
20 1992 1578 112.3 -16 +43 33.3% -1.39 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.1 -0.40 1997 1475 115.4 +37 +88 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03
21 1993 1587 115.3 -13 -10 +21 44.2% -0.48 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 -0.63 1998 1472 113.4 +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59
22 1994 1679 127.7 -57 -10 -47 46.6% -0.03 9–5 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 103.2 +0.22 1999 1584 124.6 -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99
23 1995 1650 125.3 -53 +47 -19 52.1% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 2–10 (17%) 92.8 +0.84 2000 1677 127.2 +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59
24 1996 1712 137.8 -18 +33 52.0% 0.00 7–5 (58%) 7–2 (78%) 105.7 -0.02 2001 1661 126.0 -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56
25 1997 1720 140.6 -7 +28 -87 45.2% -0.34 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 -1.88 2002 1753 142.0 -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43
26 1998 1901 156.1 -35 -31 54.9% +0.30 14–6 (70%) 5–5 (50%) 107.1 -5.73 2003 1637 117.1 +61 -104 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47
27 1999 1784 146.6 +15 +17 -174 57.7% +0.55 6–11 (35%) 4–4 (50%) 90.7 -2.27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34
28 2000 1710 130.6 +9 +70 47.5% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 98.3 -1.05 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57
29 2001 1768 141.2 +7 +61 -115 58.6% +0.43 19–7 (73%) 5–8 (38%) 105.4 +1.52 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 11.1% -3.33 0–1 +0.14
30 2002 1746 143.3 +13 +78 -56 57.4% +0.56 12–7 (63%) 6–11 (35%) 97.8 +1.12
31 2003 1719 134.0 +2.40 +1.09 1.150 52.8% -95 +122 +158 53.4% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 97.6 -1.01
32 2004 1770 142.3 +0.56 +2.59 1.099 52.2% -28 +126 +91 58.4% +0.63 16–8 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 107.1 +0.67
33 2005 1643 133.1 -0.21 +3.99 1.156 53.4% -13 +219 +164 53.1% +0.30 3–7 (30%) 4–2 (67%) 95.9 +0.59
Career 1944 143.6 +0.84 +2.64 1.135 52.8% -19 +57 +10 53.0% +0.21 122–91 (57%) 60–72 (45%) 100.6 -1.05 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.