H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 4-2

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 4–2 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2004 Wimbledon third round 2-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Silvia Farina Elia #19 2-6 6-4 7-5 Virginia Ruano Pascual #67 Match data
Apr 8, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #15 6-1 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #81 Match data
Jan 23, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Silvia Farina Elia #19 5-7 6-4 6-4 Virginia Ruano Pascual #56 Match data
Mar 1, 2001* Acapulco WTA 250 R32 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #81 6-4 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #38 Match data
Apr 1, 1999* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #25 7-5 4-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #29 Match data
Apr 26, 1998* Budapest WTA 250 F Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #50 6-4 4-6 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3