H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sílvia Soler-Espinosa vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 0-5

Roberta Vinci holds a 5–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2014 Bucharest fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sílvia Soler-Espinosa
ESP Age 38 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 11, 2014* Bucharest WTA 250 R16 Clay Roberta Vinci #24 3-6 6-2 6-1 Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #79 Match data
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Roberta Vinci #16 6-3 7-5 Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #83 Match data
Mar 7, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Roberta Vinci #22 6-3 6-3 Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #76 Match data
Mar 1, 2012* Acapulco WTA 250 R32 Clay Roberta Vinci #23 6-2 7-6(5) Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #75 Match data
Apr 28, 2011* Barcelona WTA 250 R32 Clay Roberta Vinci #42 6-2 6-3 Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #165 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #858 #54 1,157 1,643 56 102 35.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0
21 2009 0–3 0.0% #183 1,473 0 0 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2010 1–2 33.3% #167 1,470 0 0 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0
23 2011 4–6 40.0% #81 1,517 0 0 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0
24 2012 13–17 43.3% #83 1,581 0 0 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2013 12–20 37.5% #82 1,526 0 0 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1
26 2014 17–22 43.6% #66 1,566 0 0 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2
27 2015 3–14 17.6% #145 1,490 0 0 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3
28 2016 5–6 45.5% #128 1,490 0 0 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2017 1–7 12.5% #225 1,492 0 0 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2018 0–4 0.0% #190 1,543 0 0 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 2019 0–1 0.0% #681 1,547 0 0 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10