H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sílvia Soler-Espinosa vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0

Sílvia Soler-Espinosa holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa won the 2012 Madrid Open round of 64 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sílvia Soler-Espinosa
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #60 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 Tamira Paszek Match data May 9, 2012* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #858 #54 1,157 1,641 56 103 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2009 0–3 0.0% #183 1,473 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2010 1–2 33.3% #167 1,470 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2011 4–6 40.0% #81 1,517 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2012 13–18 41.9% #83 1,572 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2013 12–20 37.5% #82 1,523 0 0 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2014 17–22 43.6% #66 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 3–14 17.6% #145 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 5–6 45.5% #128 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 1–7 12.5% #225 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2018 0–4 0.0% #190 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2019 0–1 0.0% #681 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2009 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 2 1 3 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2013 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2014 5 14 19 26.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1 7 8 12.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 46 63 27.0% 35 51 86 40.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 151/159 of Sílvia Soler-Espinosa's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2009 3/3 1.0 2.3 57.7% 63.9% 43.1% 66.6% 29.9% 55.2% 32.5% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2010 3/3 0.7 3.3 66.8% 46.4% 27.4% 30.6% 65.2% 40.1% 37.1% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2011 10/10 2.6 2.0 55.2% 62.7% 47.0% 55.4% 37.8% 55.6% 40.6% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2012 29/31 1.8 3.3 51.9% 63.3% 45.1% 43.9% 43.4% 54.2% 40.8% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2013 30/32 0.8 3.4 57.3% 59.2% 41.6% 48.3% 47.8% 52.1% 40.5% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2014 35/39 1.6 2.5 59.0% 61.7% 47.9% 47.6% 42.2% 56.5% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 17/17 1.2 2.4 64.6% 55.0% 45.9% 46.8% 32.9% 51.7% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 11/11 1.2 3.4 67.1% 59.9% 46.4% 55.7% 42.7% 55.3% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 8/8 1.1 2.6 64.9% 58.5% 39.6% 51.7% 42.9% 51.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 4/4 0.3 0.8 70.9% 40.3% 43.1% 33.2% 43.8% 41.3% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1/1 0.0 2.0 65.3% 66.0% 36.0% 57.1% 25.0% 55.6% 24.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151/159 1.4 2.8 59.1% 59.7% 44.6% 48.0% 42.4% 53.5% 39.4% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2009 1474 97.6 -0.70 -3.36 0.724 44.6% — +23 — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.17 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2010 1471 96.6 -2.24 -2.66 0.620 39.1% — +15 — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.03 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2011 1518 109.9 -0.01 -2.46 0.914 48.0% +49 -43 — 38.1% -1.00 1–0 2–0 — -0.29 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2012 1573 117.2 -1.21 -2.11 0.892 47.4% +4 -38 +30 40.8% -0.83 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 102.3 -0.33 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2013 1523 109.0 -2.93 -3.15 0.846 46.2% -34 +90 +22 34.8% -1.26 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.11 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2014 1565 116.5 -0.09 -3.75 0.897 48.1% -110 +123 — 43.2% -0.42 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1490 104.4 -3.29 -3.97 0.720 44.0% -71 +85 — 21.9% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1488 100.9 -1.09 -0.42 0.981 49.4% — +107 — 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1492 103.8 -0.97 -3.58 0.810 45.2% -129 +87 — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 2–4 (33%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1541 108.6 -2.90 -0.39 0.680 40.5% — +59 — 11.1% -3.11 0–1 — — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1545 99.9 -3.32 -2.04 0.553 41.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1642 111.6 -1.49 -2.87 0.847 46.6% -53 +63 +26 35.8% -1.06 22–19 (54%) 17–23 (43%) 102.3 -0.53 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.