H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Silvija Talaja vs Amanda Hopmans H2H: 1-0

Silvija Talaja holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Hopmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 1999 Libéma Open round of 32 7-5 6-1.

CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Silvija Talaja #52 7-5 6-1 Amanda Hopmans #90 Match data Jun 17, 1999* R32 Libéma Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvija Talaja Amanda Hopmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0
19 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0
20 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0
21 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0
22 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2
23 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0
24 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0
25 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0
26 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2
27 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Silvija Talaja Amanda Hopmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1994 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1995 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1996 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 9 17 26 34.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Silvija Talaja Amanda Hopmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1993 1482 107.8 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 -0.02
16 1994 1486 96.1 40.0% -0.40 1–0 +0.23
17 1995 1456 101.4 +52 14.3% -2.57 0–1 -0.09
18 1996 1588 117.3 +65 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 +0.42
19 1997 1554 99.9 +85 38.5% -0.92 0–1 +0.70
20 1998 1603 114.3 -33 +19 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 +0.52
21 1999 1700 132.3 -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18
22 2000 1643 137.9 -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17
23 2001 1542 116.1 +25 +122 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71 1999 1549 120.0 +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43
24 2002 1562 119.3 +33 +31 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04 2000 1539 112.0 +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81
25 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68 2001 1518 107.4 +27 -16 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 -0.79
26 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 +0.24
27 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 +0.31
Career 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34 1604 115.7 +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.