H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Silvija Talaja vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 2-0
Silvija Talaja holds a 2–0 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 1996 Karlovy Vary third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1996* | Karlovy Vary | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 6-1 6-3 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1996* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvija Talaja | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |