H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvija Talaja vs Dominique Monami H2H: 0-1
Dominique Monami holds a 1–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 2000 New Haven fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2000* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-3 7-5 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvija Talaja | Dominique Monami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |