H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvija Talaja vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 1-0
Silvija Talaja holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Pampoulova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz third round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Elena Pampoulova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvija Talaja | Elena Pampoulova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |