H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Silvija Talaja vs Elena Tatarkova H2H: 2-0

Silvija Talaja holds a 2–0 lead over Elena Tatarkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2004 Stockholm round of 32 2-6 6-2 6-4.

CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings
UKR Age 50 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Silvija Talaja #106 2-6 6-2 6-4 Elena Tatarkova #167 Match data Aug 5, 2004* R32 Stockholm Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Silvija Talaja #36 4-6 6-4 6-1 Elena Tatarkova #105 Match data Aug 18, 1999* R64 Canadian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Elena Tatarkova #532 #45 581 1,600 21 49 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvija Talaja Elena Tatarkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #240 1,485 0 0
18 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0 1995 3–4 42.9% #192 1,505 0 0
19 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #196 1,517 0 0
20 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0 1997 0–3 0.0% #134 1,475 0 0
21 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0 1998 7–8 46.7% #47 1,588 0 0
22 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2 1999 6–19 24.0% #116 1,514 0 0
23 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2
24 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2 2001 0–2 0.0% #189 1,494 0 0
25 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2 2002 1–4 20.0% #176 1,489 0 0
26 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2 2003 2–4 33.3% #130 1,486 0 0
27 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2 2004 0–2 0.0% #236 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Silvija Talaja Elena Tatarkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1994 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1996 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 10 22 32 31.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 8 11 27.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Silvija Talaja Elena Tatarkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1993 1482 107.8 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 -0.02
16 1994 1486 96.1 40.0% -0.40 1–0 +0.23
17 1995 1456 101.4 +52 14.3% -2.57 0–1 -0.09 1994 1485 97.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.02
18 1996 1588 117.3 +65 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 +0.42 1995 1506 103.3 +40 30.8% -1.85 1–0 3–0 (100%) -0.03
19 1997 1554 99.9 +85 38.5% -0.92 0–1 +0.70 1996 1517 100.4 +50 55.6% -0.44 0–1 2–0 +0.59
20 1998 1603 114.3 -33 +19 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 +0.52 1997 1476 94.9 0.0% -2.67 0–1 +0.22
21 1999 1700 132.3 -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18 1998 1588 136.7 -2 -31 48.6% +0.14 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 99.4 +0.01
22 2000 1643 137.9 -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17 1999 1514 110.0 -7 -20 +78 27.8% -1.46 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 -0.17
23 2001 1542 116.1 +25 +122 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71
24 2002 1562 119.3 +33 +31 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04 2001 1494 96.3 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.18
25 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68 2002 1490 100.7 +112 20.0% -2.20 2–1 (67%) -0.54
26 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 +0.24 2003 1487 104.1 -15 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) +0.19
27 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 +0.31 2004 1472 103.3 20.0% -1.40 0–1 -0.12
Career 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34 1601 115.1 +7 -24 +89 32.7% -1.17 5–10 (33%) 11–9 (55%) 99.7 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.