H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Silvija Talaja vs Fang Li H2H: 0-1

Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Pattaya semifinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fang Li #45 6-3 6-3 Silvija Talaja #114 Match data Nov 21, 1998* SF Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvija Talaja Fang Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0
20 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0
21 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0
22 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0
23 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0
24 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0
25 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0
26 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0
27 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Silvija Talaja Fang Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Silvija Talaja Fang Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1993 1482 107.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1994 1486 96.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1456 101.4 — — — — — +52 — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1588 117.3 — — — — — +65 — 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1554 99.9 — — — — — +85 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 — — +0.70 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
20 1998 1603 114.3 — — — — -33 +19 — 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.52 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54
21 1999 1700 132.3 — — — — -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90
22 2000 1643 137.9 — — — — -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34
23 2001 1542 116.1 — — — — +25 +122 — 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31
24 2002 1562 119.3 — — — — +33 +31 — 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54
25 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15
26 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 — 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 — +0.24 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13
27 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 — — 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 — +0.31 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00
Career — 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34 — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.