H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvija Talaja vs Fang Li H2H: 0-1
Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Pattaya semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1998* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Fang Li | 6-3 6-3 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Silvija Talaja | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |