H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvija Talaja vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 1-1
Silvija Talaja and Nicole Arendt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Arendt leads 1–0 on grass, while Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2000 Gold Coast third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2000* | Gold Coast | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Silvija Talaja | 6-3 6-1 | Nicole Arendt | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1999* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Nicole Arendt | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvija Talaja | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |