H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvija Talaja vs Paola Suarez H2H: 3-0
Silvija Talaja holds a 3–0 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2001 US Open first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Silvija Talaja | 7-5 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1999* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| May 4, 1996* | Bol | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvija Talaja | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |