H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Silvija Talaja vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz semifinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 1996* Maria Lankowitz WTA 250 SF Clay Sandra Cecchini #98 6-3 6-2 Silvija Talaja #150 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvija Talaja Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11