H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Silvija Talaja vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz semifinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #98 6-3 6-2 Silvija Talaja #150 Match data Aug 10, 1996* SF Maria Lankowitz Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvija Talaja Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Silvija Talaja Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1995 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1996 — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Silvija Talaja Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1993 1482 107.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1994 1486 96.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.23 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1995 1456 101.4 — — — — — +52 — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.09 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1996 1588 117.3 — — — — — +65 — 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.42 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1997 1554 99.9 — — — — — +85 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 — — +0.70 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1998 1603 114.3 — — — — -33 +19 — 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.52 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1999 1700 132.3 — — — — -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 2000 1643 137.9 — — — — -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 2001 1542 116.1 — — — — +25 +122 — 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 2002 1562 119.3 — — — — +33 +31 — 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 — 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 — +0.24 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 — — 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 — +0.31 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.