H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Sloane Stephens vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 2-1
Sloane Stephens holds a 2–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on clay, while Sloane Stephens leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sloane Stephens won the 2014 Birmingham third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2014* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Sloane Stephens | 6-2 6-4 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 6-3 6-4 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| May 26, 2012* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Francesca Schiavone | 7-5 6-1 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sloane Stephens | Francesca Schiavone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 | 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 | 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 | 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 | 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 | 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 | 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 |
| 31 | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 | 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 |
| 32 | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 | 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 |
| 33 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 | 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 |