H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sloane Stephens vs Lauren Davis H2H: 3-3

Sloane Stephens and Lauren Davis are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lauren Davis leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Sloane Stephens leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sloane Stephens won the 2023 Tennis In the Land first round 1-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sloane Stephens
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main-draw meetings
Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sloane Stephens #38 1-6 6-3 6-1 Lauren Davis #50 Match data Aug 23, 2023* R32 Tennis In the Land WTA 250 Hard
Lauren Davis #54 7-6(8) 3-6 6-1 Sloane Stephens #40 Match data Aug 3, 2023* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Hard
Lauren Davis #84 6-2 6-2 Sloane Stephens #36 Match data Jan 11, 2023* R32 Hobart International WTA 250 Hard
Sloane Stephens #37 6-4 6-4 Lauren Davis #75 Match data Jul 2, 2015* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lauren Davis #54 1-6 6-4 6-1 Sloane Stephens #35 Match data Jan 8, 2015* R16 ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Sloane Stephens #29 6-3 4-6 7-5 Lauren Davis #91 Match data Jan 12, 2013* QF Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sloane Stephens #209 #3 5,727 1,952 303 249 54.9% 1 1 0 1 5 8
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sloane Stephens Lauren Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 2–3 40.0% #204 1,519 0 0 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0
18 2011 7–9 43.8% #96 1,580 0 0 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0
19 2012 21–17 55.3% #38 1,709 0 0 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0
20 2013 40–22 64.5% #12 1,827 0 0 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0
21 2014 20–19 51.3% #36 1,732 0 0 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0
22 2015 34–20 63.0% #30 1,787 0 1 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0
23 2016 21–10 67.7% #35 1,755 0 4 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1
24 2017 15–8 65.2% #13 1,863 1 5 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1
25 2018 34–19 64.2% #6 1,920 1 6 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1
26 2019 22–19 53.7% #25 1,786 1 6 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1
27 2020 4–11 26.7% #39 1,641 1 6 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1
28 2021 18–17 51.4% #65 1,759 1 6 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1
29 2022 18–17 51.4% #37 1,785 1 7 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2
30 2023 21–20 51.2% #47 1,789 1 7 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2
31 2024 19–21 47.5% #74 1,688 1 8 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2
32 2025 0–5 0.0% #479 1,603 1 8 — — — — — — —
33 2026 7–12 36.8% #209 1,699 1 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sloane Stephens Lauren Davis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2013 29 16 45 64.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2014 11 10 21 52.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2015 20 13 33 60.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2016 10 6 16 62.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2017 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2020 3 8 11 27.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2021 6 11 17 35.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2022 13 9 22 59.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2023 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2025 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 163 349 53.3% 93 67 160 58.1% 24 19 43 55.8% — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 520/552 of Sloane Stephens's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sloane Stephens Lauren Davis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 5/5 0.6 3.6 64.1% 58.7% 39.2% 42.2% 62.2% 52.1% 42.9% 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6%
18 2011 16/16 1.4 3.0 59.3% 59.3% 47.2% 41.8% 52.7% 54.1% 43.8% 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9%
19 2012 36/38 1.7 3.6 62.4% 61.6% 46.4% 48.6% 43.2% 55.6% 45.1% 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9%
20 2013 58/62 2.1 2.7 64.9% 63.2% 45.5% 49.3% 49.5% 56.8% 44.8% 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8%
21 2014 37/39 1.7 2.4 68.3% 62.0% 46.2% 53.8% 38.4% 57.0% 41.9% 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7%
22 2015 44/54 2.4 2.3 61.6% 65.6% 54.6% 58.0% 54.1% 61.5% 42.6% 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2016 29/31 2.0 1.8 65.8% 64.5% 49.5% 52.7% 47.8% 59.4% 44.8% 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6%
24 2017 22/23 1.1 1.5 67.7% 61.0% 47.2% 59.8% 54.5% 56.6% 41.8% 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6%
25 2018 47/53 0.8 1.5 69.8% 62.1% 49.9% 51.8% 51.5% 58.5% 47.2% 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3%
26 2019 39/41 1.0 1.7 69.4% 59.9% 47.7% 47.6% 43.1% 56.2% 44.2% 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2%
27 2020 15/15 2.2 2.0 69.5% 61.1% 47.1% 50.2% 44.4% 56.6% 40.0% 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0%
28 2021 35/35 1.5 2.1 69.1% 59.7% 46.9% 57.7% 45.3% 55.7% 42.8% 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7%
29 2022 35/35 1.2 2.1 71.3% 60.8% 45.5% 51.6% 51.8% 56.4% 44.7% 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8%
30 2023 40/41 1.1 2.2 69.4% 60.6% 45.7% 51.1% 51.2% 56.1% 43.8% 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7%
31 2024 40/40 0.8 1.6 72.9% 58.8% 49.8% 46.9% 39.1% 55.9% 42.6% 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8%
32 2025 3/5 1.0 2.7 64.5% 54.1% 31.3% 50.1% 42.1% 46.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 19/19 0.9 2.0 66.5% 57.5% 47.5% 54.6% 45.5% 54.2% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 520/552 1.5 2.2 67.3% 61.4% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 56.9% 43.7% — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sloane Stephens Lauren Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1519 108.2 -1.34 +0.26 0.895 47.8% — +19 — 40.0% -1.10 — 2–0 — -0.36 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
18 2011 1581 116.3 -0.64 -0.35 0.955 48.8% +19 -78 — 40.6% -0.69 1–1 2–0 — +0.03 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
19 2012 1709 130.0 +0.14 +1.30 1.016 50.3% -38 -86 -53 52.7% +0.20 9–8 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 +0.59 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03
20 2013 1827 148.1 +1.68 +1.63 1.037 50.8% -16 -126 -97 58.2% +0.39 17–7 (71%) 8–6 (57%) 109.7 +0.29 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07
21 2014 1733 132.5 +1.10 -0.90 0.974 49.4% +23 -27 -2 51.7% -0.02 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.3 +0.75 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82
22 2015 1787 143.0 +3.00 +2.02 1.106 52.3% -23 -18 -9 60.9% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–1 (91%) 104.6 -2.66 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31
23 2016 1756 122.0 +2.14 +0.81 1.106 52.0% -20 +53 +23 60.9% +0.56 7–2 (78%) 8–2 (80%) 107.2 +0.83 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39
24 2017 1864 153.6 +0.98 +1.17 0.964 49.2% +11 — — 57.7% +0.35 8–0 (100%) 4–2 (67%) 111.8 -1.70 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 2018 1921 157.9 +2.48 +3.98 1.139 52.7% +6 -17 — 61.0% +0.94 10–9 (53%) 3–7 (30%) 96.1 -0.56 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90
26 2019 1786 136.3 -0.49 +1.33 1.009 50.2% -24 +182 -21 52.6% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 11–2 (85%) 104.6 +1.76 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17
27 2020 1641 114.3 +0.15 -1.60 0.922 48.1% +16 +243 — 37.8% -0.68 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +1.57 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59
28 2021 1760 134.1 -0.59 +0.37 0.967 49.3% -115 +157 +83 52.4% -0.19 6–8 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 97.2 -0.75 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24
29 2022 1785 140.6 -0.05 +2.25 1.024 50.4% +9 +46 — 50.6% +0.06 7–8 (47%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.24 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58
30 2023 1790 135.6 -0.42 +1.25 0.998 49.9% -56 +122 — 50.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 3–6 (33%) 94.4 -0.37 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 2024 1689 137.0 -0.42 -0.12 0.965 49.0% -19 +171 +35 47.3% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.59 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00
32 2025 1604 109.9 -1.23 +0.23 0.757 43.6% -34 — — 16.7% -2.34 0–2 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1699 132.4 -1.61 -2.12 0.859 47.0% -20 +56 — 36.6% -1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 145.6 +0.68 +1.07 1.013 50.2% -17 +47 -9 53.0% +0.11 97–84 (54%) 69–45 (61%) 107.5 -0.49 — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.