H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sloane Stephens vs Mathilde Johansson H2H: 1-0
Sloane Stephens holds a 1–0 lead over Mathilde Johansson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sloane Stephens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sloane Stephens won the 2012 Roland Garros third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Sloane Stephens | 6-3 6-2 | Mathilde Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sloane Stephens | Mathilde Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |