H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sloane Stephens vs Sara Bejlek H2H: 0-1

Sara Bejlek holds a 1–0 lead over Sloane Stephens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Bejlek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Bejlek won the 2026 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sloane Stephens
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sara Bejlek
Czech Republic Age 20 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Bejlek #35 6-3 6-2 Sloane Stephens #361 Match data May 24, 2026 R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sloane Stephens #209 #3 5,727 1,952 303 249 54.9% 1 1 0 1 5 8
Sara Bejlek #30 #29 1,652 1,884 26 27 49.1% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Bejlek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #181 1,460 0 0
17 2010 2–3 40.0% #204 1,519 0 0 2023 0–2 0.0% #129 1,561 0 0
18 2011 7–9 43.8% #96 1,580 0 0 2024 3–4 42.9% #161 1,663 0 0
19 2012 21–17 55.3% #38 1,709 0 0 2025 3–4 42.9% #92 1,785 0 0
20 2013 40–22 64.5% #12 1,827 0 0 2026 20–16 55.6% #30 1,854 0 1
21 2014 20–19 51.3% #36 1,732 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2015 34–20 63.0% #30 1,787 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2016 21–10 67.7% #35 1,755 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 2017 15–8 65.2% #13 1,863 1 5 — — — — — — —
25 2018 34–19 64.2% #6 1,920 1 6 — — — — — — —
26 2019 22–19 53.7% #25 1,786 1 6 — — — — — — —
27 2020 4–11 26.7% #39 1,641 1 6 — — — — — — —
28 2021 18–17 51.4% #65 1,759 1 6 — — — — — — —
29 2022 18–17 51.4% #37 1,785 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 2023 21–20 51.2% #47 1,789 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 2024 19–21 47.5% #74 1,688 1 8 — — — — — — —
32 2025 0–5 0.0% #479 1,603 1 8 — — — — — — —
33 2026 7–12 36.8% #209 1,699 1 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Bejlek
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2011 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2013 29 16 45 64.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2026 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
21 2014 11 10 21 52.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 20 13 33 60.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 10 6 16 62.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 3 8 11 27.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 6 11 17 35.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 13 9 22 59.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 163 349 53.3% 93 67 160 58.1% 24 19 43 55.8% — 19 15 34 55.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 520/552 of Sloane Stephens's and 48/54 of Sara Bejlek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Bejlek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.2% 59.4% 38.5% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 27.7%
17 2010 5/5 0.6 3.6 64.1% 58.7% 39.2% 42.2% 62.2% 52.1% 42.9% 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 69.5% 40.0% 38.6% 35.4% 83.3% 39.5% 33.9%
18 2011 16/16 1.4 3.0 59.3% 59.3% 47.2% 41.8% 52.7% 54.1% 43.8% 2024 7/7 0.4 4.3 65.4% 56.4% 39.8% 57.6% 43.9% 50.2% 46.7%
19 2012 36/38 1.7 3.6 62.4% 61.6% 46.4% 48.6% 43.2% 55.6% 45.1% 2025 5/7 0.0 2.4 73.6% 56.5% 59.4% 36.1% 67.5% 56.9% 45.5%
20 2013 58/62 2.1 2.7 64.9% 63.2% 45.5% 49.3% 49.5% 56.8% 44.8% 2026 33/37 0.9 2.6 62.5% 58.9% 46.7% 53.6% 48.6% 54.3% 46.3%
21 2014 37/39 1.7 2.4 68.3% 62.0% 46.2% 53.8% 38.4% 57.0% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 44/54 2.4 2.3 61.6% 65.6% 54.6% 58.0% 54.1% 61.5% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 29/31 2.0 1.8 65.8% 64.5% 49.5% 52.7% 47.8% 59.4% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 22/23 1.1 1.5 67.7% 61.0% 47.2% 59.8% 54.5% 56.6% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2018 47/53 0.8 1.5 69.8% 62.1% 49.9% 51.8% 51.5% 58.5% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 39/41 1.0 1.7 69.4% 59.9% 47.7% 47.6% 43.1% 56.2% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 15/15 2.2 2.0 69.5% 61.1% 47.1% 50.2% 44.4% 56.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 35/35 1.5 2.1 69.1% 59.7% 46.9% 57.7% 45.3% 55.7% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 35/35 1.2 2.1 71.3% 60.8% 45.5% 51.6% 51.8% 56.4% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 40/41 1.1 2.2 69.4% 60.6% 45.7% 51.1% 51.2% 56.1% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 40/40 0.8 1.6 72.9% 58.8% 49.8% 46.9% 39.1% 55.9% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 3/5 1.0 2.7 64.5% 54.1% 31.3% 50.1% 42.1% 46.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 19/19 0.9 2.0 66.5% 57.5% 47.5% 54.6% 45.5% 54.2% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 520/552 1.5 2.2 67.3% 61.4% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 56.9% 43.7% — 48/54 0.7 3.0 64.2% 57.5% 46.5% 51.5% 50.3% 53.3% 45.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Bejlek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1483 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1460 103.3 -0.63 +4.78 0.553 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.09
17 2010 1519 108.2 -1.34 +0.26 0.895 47.8% — +19 — 40.0% -1.10 — 2–0 — -0.36 2023 1561 99.6 -2.36 -0.77 0.561 38.0% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.05
18 2011 1581 116.3 -0.64 -0.35 0.955 48.8% +19 -78 — 40.6% -0.69 1–1 2–0 — +0.03 2024 1664 121.5 -1.97 +1.26 0.939 48.6% — +58 — 43.8% -0.38 1–1 1–1 — -0.51
19 2012 1709 130.0 +0.14 +1.30 1.016 50.3% -38 -86 -53 52.7% +0.20 9–8 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 +0.59 2025 1785 124.3 -1.30 -0.39 1.055 51.6% -174 — — 46.7% -0.07 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.15
20 2013 1827 148.1 +1.68 +1.63 1.037 50.8% -16 -126 -97 58.2% +0.39 17–7 (71%) 8–6 (57%) 109.7 +0.29 2026 1855 146.3 -1.65 +3.45 1.014 50.4% +4 -38 -267 53.8% +0.32 6–2 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 107.1 -0.29
21 2014 1733 132.5 +1.10 -0.90 0.974 49.4% +23 -27 -2 51.7% -0.02 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.3 +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1787 143.0 +3.00 +2.02 1.106 52.3% -23 -18 -9 60.9% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–1 (91%) 104.6 -2.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 1756 122.0 +2.14 +0.81 1.106 52.0% -20 +53 +23 60.9% +0.56 7–2 (78%) 8–2 (80%) 107.2 +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 1864 153.6 +0.98 +1.17 0.964 49.2% +11 — — 57.7% +0.35 8–0 (100%) 4–2 (67%) 111.8 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2018 1921 157.9 +2.48 +3.98 1.139 52.7% +6 -17 — 61.0% +0.94 10–9 (53%) 3–7 (30%) 96.1 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 1786 136.3 -0.49 +1.33 1.009 50.2% -24 +182 -21 52.6% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 11–2 (85%) 104.6 +1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1641 114.3 +0.15 -1.60 0.922 48.1% +16 +243 — 37.8% -0.68 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 1760 134.1 -0.59 +0.37 0.967 49.3% -115 +157 +83 52.4% -0.19 6–8 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 97.2 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 1785 140.6 -0.05 +2.25 1.024 50.4% +9 +46 — 50.6% +0.06 7–8 (47%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 1790 135.6 -0.42 +1.25 0.998 49.9% -56 +122 — 50.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 3–6 (33%) 94.4 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1689 137.0 -0.42 -0.12 0.965 49.0% -19 +171 +35 47.3% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1604 109.9 -1.23 +0.23 0.757 43.6% -34 — — 16.7% -2.34 0–2 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1699 132.4 -1.61 -2.12 0.859 47.0% -20 +56 — 36.6% -1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 145.6 +0.68 +1.07 1.013 50.2% -17 +47 -9 53.0% +0.11 97–84 (54%) 69–45 (61%) 107.5 -0.49 — 1885 136.2 -1.67 +2.58 0.972 49.5% -26 +6 -267 48.7% -0.06 7–4 (64%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.