H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sloane Stephens vs Sara Errani H2H: 2-1

Sloane Stephens holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sloane Stephens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sloane Stephens won the 2021 Parma quarterfinal 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sloane Stephens
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sloane Stephens #65 6-3 6-0 Sara Errani #108 Match data May 22, 2021* QF Parma WTA 250 Clay
Sloane Stephens #90 3-6 6-2 7-5 Sara Errani #30 Match data Mar 21, 2012* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Sara Errani #38 6-1 7-5 Sloane Stephens #110 Match data Aug 17, 2011* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sloane Stephens #209 #3 5,727 1,952 303 249 54.9% 1 1 0 1 5 8
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Errani
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 2–3 40.0% #204 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 7–9 43.8% #96 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 21–17 55.3% #38 1,709 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0
20 2013 40–22 64.5% #12 1,827 0 0 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0
21 2014 20–19 51.3% #36 1,732 0 0 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2
22 2015 34–20 63.0% #30 1,787 0 1 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2
23 2016 21–10 67.7% #35 1,755 0 4 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2
24 2017 15–8 65.2% #13 1,863 1 5 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2
25 2018 34–19 64.2% #6 1,920 1 6 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6
26 2019 22–19 53.7% #25 1,786 1 6 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7
27 2020 4–11 26.7% #39 1,641 1 6 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7
28 2021 18–17 51.4% #65 1,759 1 6 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8
29 2022 18–17 51.4% #37 1,785 1 7 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9
30 2023 21–20 51.2% #47 1,789 1 7 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9
31 2024 19–21 47.5% #74 1,688 1 8 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9
32 2025 0–5 0.0% #479 1,603 1 8 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9
33 2026 7–12 36.8% #209 1,699 1 8 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Errani
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 29 16 45 64.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 11 10 21 52.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2015 20 13 33 60.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2016 10 6 16 62.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2017 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2020 3 8 11 27.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2021 6 11 17 35.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2022 13 9 22 59.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2023 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
32 2025 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 2026 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 163 349 53.3% 93 67 160 58.1% 24 19 43 55.8% — — — — — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 520/552 of Sloane Stephens's and 593/692 of Sara Errani's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Errani
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 5/5 0.6 3.6 64.1% 58.7% 39.2% 42.2% 62.2% 52.1% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 16/16 1.4 3.0 59.3% 59.3% 47.2% 41.8% 52.7% 54.1% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 36/38 1.7 3.6 62.4% 61.6% 46.4% 48.6% 43.2% 55.6% 45.1% 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5%
20 2013 58/62 2.1 2.7 64.9% 63.2% 45.5% 49.3% 49.5% 56.8% 44.8% 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4%
21 2014 37/39 1.7 2.4 68.3% 62.0% 46.2% 53.8% 38.4% 57.0% 41.9% 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7%
22 2015 44/54 2.4 2.3 61.6% 65.6% 54.6% 58.0% 54.1% 61.5% 42.6% 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6%
23 2016 29/31 2.0 1.8 65.8% 64.5% 49.5% 52.7% 47.8% 59.4% 44.8% 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7%
24 2017 22/23 1.1 1.5 67.7% 61.0% 47.2% 59.8% 54.5% 56.6% 41.8% 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1%
25 2018 47/53 0.8 1.5 69.8% 62.1% 49.9% 51.8% 51.5% 58.5% 47.2% 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5%
26 2019 39/41 1.0 1.7 69.4% 59.9% 47.7% 47.6% 43.1% 56.2% 44.2% 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4%
27 2020 15/15 2.2 2.0 69.5% 61.1% 47.1% 50.2% 44.4% 56.6% 40.0% 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1%
28 2021 35/35 1.5 2.1 69.1% 59.7% 46.9% 57.7% 45.3% 55.7% 42.8% 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7%
29 2022 35/35 1.2 2.1 71.3% 60.8% 45.5% 51.6% 51.8% 56.4% 44.7% 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0%
30 2023 40/41 1.1 2.2 69.4% 60.6% 45.7% 51.1% 51.2% 56.1% 43.8% 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6%
31 2024 40/40 0.8 1.6 72.9% 58.8% 49.8% 46.9% 39.1% 55.9% 42.6% 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0%
32 2025 3/5 1.0 2.7 64.5% 54.1% 31.3% 50.1% 42.1% 46.2% 40.7% 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0%
33 2026 19/19 0.9 2.0 66.5% 57.5% 47.5% 54.6% 45.5% 54.2% 39.3% 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8%
Career — 520/552 1.5 2.2 67.3% 61.4% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 56.9% 43.7% — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sloane Stephens Sara Errani
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1519 108.2 -1.34 +0.26 0.895 47.8% — +19 — 40.0% -1.10 — 2–0 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1581 116.3 -0.64 -0.35 0.955 48.8% +19 -78 — 40.6% -0.69 1–1 2–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1709 130.0 +0.14 +1.30 1.016 50.3% -38 -86 -53 52.7% +0.20 9–8 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 +0.59 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21
20 2013 1827 148.1 +1.68 +1.63 1.037 50.8% -16 -126 -97 58.2% +0.39 17–7 (71%) 8–6 (57%) 109.7 +0.29 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20
21 2014 1733 132.5 +1.10 -0.90 0.974 49.4% +23 -27 -2 51.7% -0.02 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.3 +0.75 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64
22 2015 1787 143.0 +3.00 +2.02 1.106 52.3% -23 -18 -9 60.9% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–1 (91%) 104.6 -2.66 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75
23 2016 1756 122.0 +2.14 +0.81 1.106 52.0% -20 +53 +23 60.9% +0.56 7–2 (78%) 8–2 (80%) 107.2 +0.83 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24
24 2017 1864 153.6 +0.98 +1.17 0.964 49.2% +11 — — 57.7% +0.35 8–0 (100%) 4–2 (67%) 111.8 -1.70 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90
25 2018 1921 157.9 +2.48 +3.98 1.139 52.7% +6 -17 — 61.0% +0.94 10–9 (53%) 3–7 (30%) 96.1 -0.56 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43
26 2019 1786 136.3 -0.49 +1.33 1.009 50.2% -24 +182 -21 52.6% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 11–2 (85%) 104.6 +1.76 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44
27 2020 1641 114.3 +0.15 -1.60 0.922 48.1% +16 +243 — 37.8% -0.68 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +1.57 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02
28 2021 1760 134.1 -0.59 +0.37 0.967 49.3% -115 +157 +83 52.4% -0.19 6–8 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 97.2 -0.75 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08
29 2022 1785 140.6 -0.05 +2.25 1.024 50.4% +9 +46 — 50.6% +0.06 7–8 (47%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.24 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33
30 2023 1790 135.6 -0.42 +1.25 0.998 49.9% -56 +122 — 50.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 3–6 (33%) 94.4 -0.37 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62
31 2024 1689 137.0 -0.42 -0.12 0.965 49.0% -19 +171 +35 47.3% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.59 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13
32 2025 1604 109.9 -1.23 +0.23 0.757 43.6% -34 — — 16.7% -2.34 0–2 — — -0.11 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92
33 2026 1699 132.4 -1.61 -2.12 0.859 47.0% -19 +56 — 36.6% -1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.66 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
Career — 1952 145.6 +0.68 +1.07 1.013 50.2% -17 +47 -9 53.0% +0.11 97–84 (54%) 69–45 (61%) 107.5 -0.49 — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.