H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sofia Arvidsson vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-1
Sofia Arvidsson holds a 2–1 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sofia Arvidsson leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sofia Arvidsson won the 2012 Cincinnati second round 6-1 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sofia Arvidsson | 6-1 2-1 (ret.) | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2011* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sofia Arvidsson | 6-3 6-1 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
| Sep 18, 2010* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Tamira Paszek | 6-3 6-4 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sofia Arvidsson | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |