H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Sophie Amiach vs Kate Glancy H2H: 0-2

Kate Glancy holds a 2–0 lead over Sophie Amiach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Glancy leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Glancy won the 1982 Porto Alegre quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sophie Amiach
FRA Age 62 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Glancy 6-3 6-4 Sophie Amiach Match data Apr 3, 1982* QF Porto Alegre WTA 250 Clay
Kate Glancy 6-3 6-3 Sophie Amiach Match data Mar 20, 1982* QF Brasilia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sophie Amiach #577 #57 9 1,647 57 93 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sophie Amiach Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 1980 10–5 66.7% — 1,554 0 0 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 1981 6–6 50.0% — 1,609 0 0 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 1982 8–8 50.0% — 1,585 0 0 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
19 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1984 12–15 44.4% #76 1,627 0 0 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 1985 5–15 25.0% #121 1,531 0 0 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 1986 1–4 20.0% #173 1,514 0 0 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #213 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1989 7–13 35.0% #129 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1990 2–6 25.0% #227 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1991 1–2 33.3% #243 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1992 0–2 0.0% #241 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1993 2–7 22.2% #199 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #233 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1995 0–2 0.0% #446 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sophie Amiach Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 1980 — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1981 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
24 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 26 39 33.3% 27 32 59 45.8% 16 22 38 42.1% 1 11 12 8.3% — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sophie Amiach Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.30
16 1980 1555 115.8 — — — — — +54 +8 73.1% +1.85 1–1 — — +2.63 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 1981 1610 112.9 — — — — — +92 — 46.4% -0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.13 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.25
18 1982 1585 105.8 — — — — — +68 — 50.0% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +1.61 1978 1461 102.2 — — — — +124 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.21
19 1983 1598 109.9 — — — — — — +20 33.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1627 116.0 — — — — -64 -4 +40 44.6% -0.48 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.9 +2.43 1980 1422 87.2 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.30
21 1985 1532 102.5 — — — — -35 — +91 33.3% -1.58 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.1 +1.91 1981 1423 99.0 — — — — +111 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.44
22 1986 1515 102.1 — — — — -16 — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 2–0 — +0.03 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +26 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.49
24 1988 1513 105.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 1555 119.2 — — — — -84 +17 +75 35.4% -1.08 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 104.3 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 1530 102.1 — — — — — +28 +77 22.2% -2.67 2–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1518 104.5 — — — — -43 — — 33.3% -0.50 — — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1501 105.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1477 104.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.0% -1.30 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1472 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1460 106.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1647 115.8 — — — — -47 +49 +50 40.4% -0.80 20–24 (45%) 16–12 (57%) 102.7 +5.11 — 1582 100.7 — — — — +69 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.