H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sophie Amiach vs Kim Jones H2H: 1-1

Sophie Amiach and Kim Jones are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1985 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 3-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sophie Amiach
FRA Age 62 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kim Jones
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 6-4 3-6 6-0 Sophie Amiach #97 Match data Jun 12, 1985* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Sophie Amiach #104 1-6 6-2 6-3 Kim Jones Match data Nov 14, 1984* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sophie Amiach #577 #57 9 1,647 57 93 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kim Jones — — — 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sophie Amiach Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 10–5 66.7% — 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 6–6 50.0% — 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 8–8 50.0% — 1,585 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1984 12–15 44.4% #76 1,627 0 0 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1985 5–15 25.0% #121 1,531 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
22 1986 1–4 20.0% #173 1,514 0 0 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,422 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,458 0 0
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #213 1,512 0 0 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0
25 1989 7–13 35.0% #129 1,555 0 0 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,757 0 1
26 1990 2–6 25.0% #227 1,529 0 0 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1
27 1991 1–2 33.3% #243 1,517 0 0 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,724 0 1
28 1992 0–2 0.0% #241 1,501 0 0 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1
29 1993 2–7 22.2% #199 1,477 0 0 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #233 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1995 0–2 0.0% #446 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sophie Amiach Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 26 39 33.3% 27 32 59 45.8% 16 22 38 42.1% 1 11 12 8.3% — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sophie Amiach Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1555 115.8 — — — — — +54 +8 73.1% +1.85 1–1 — — +2.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1610 112.9 — — — — — +92 — 46.4% -0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1585 105.8 — — — — — +68 — 50.0% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1598 109.9 — — — — — — +20 33.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1627 116.0 — — — — -64 -4 +40 44.6% -0.48 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.9 +2.43 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08
21 1985 1532 102.5 — — — — -35 — +91 33.3% -1.58 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.1 +1.91 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
22 1986 1515 102.1 — — — — -16 — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 2–0 — +0.03 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +36 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.50
24 1988 1513 105.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.18 1982 1484 103.7 — — — — -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1989 1555 119.2 — — — — -84 +17 +75 35.4% -1.08 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 104.3 -0.56 1983 1758 131.9 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1990 1530 102.1 — — — — — +28 +77 22.2% -2.67 2–0 1–1 — -0.10 1984 1667 132.6 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1991 1518 104.5 — — — — -43 — — 33.3% -0.50 — — — +0.39 1985 1725 135.5 — — — — -10 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1992 1501 105.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.09 1986 1677 104.5 — — — — -12 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70
29 1993 1477 104.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.0% -1.30 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 1987 1629 103.9 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.24
30 1994 1472 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1460 106.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1647 115.8 — — — — -47 +49 +50 40.4% -0.80 20–24 (45%) 16–12 (57%) 102.7 +5.11 — 1801 126.3 — — — — -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.