H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sophie Amiach vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-2
Sophie Amiach and Laura Arraya are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Sophie Amiach won the 1989 Roland Garros second round 7-6(0) 6-7(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Sophie Amiach | 7-6(0) 6-7(4) 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| May 24, 1984* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-3 | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
| May 11, 1983* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1982 | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Sophie Amiach | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophie Amiach | #577 | #57 | 9 | 1,649 | 57 | 93 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sophie Amiach | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1982 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1985 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #129 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1993 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #199 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |