H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sophie Amiach vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-2
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Sophie Amiach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Chicago third round 6-4 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1994* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 3-2 (ret.) | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1993* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-7 6-4 6-1 | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophie Amiach | #577 | #57 | 9 | 1,649 | 57 | 93 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sophie Amiach | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #129 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #199 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |