H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sophie Amiach vs Natasha Reva H2H: 1-1
Sophie Amiach and Natasha Reva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Reva leads 1–0 on grass, while Sophie Amiach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Reva won the 1984 Eastbourne second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1984* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Natasha Reva | 7-5 6-2 | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1984* | Denver | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sophie Amiach | 7-5 7-6 | Natasha Reva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophie Amiach | #577 | #57 | 9 | 1,649 | 57 | 93 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natasha Reva | — | — | — | 1,571 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sophie Amiach | Natasha Reva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #129 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #199 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |