H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sophie Amiach vs Sara Gomer H2H: 1-0
Sophie Amiach holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sophie Amiach leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sophie Amiach won the 1989 Birmingham third round 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1989* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sophie Amiach | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophie Amiach | #577 | #57 | 9 | 1,649 | 57 | 93 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sophie Amiach | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #129 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #199 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |