H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 5-2

Sorana Cirstea holds a 5–2 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sorana Cirstea leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sorana Cirstea won the 2021 Montreal second round 6-3 6-4.

ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 2021* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sorana Cirstea #40 6-3 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #37 Match data
Jan 5, 2019* Shenzhen WTA 250 QF Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #62 7-5 6-1 Sorana Cirstea #84 Match data
Aug 29, 2018* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sorana Cirstea #51 6-3 3-6 7-5 Alison Riske-Amritraj #75 Match data
May 26, 2018* Nurnberg WTA 250 QF Clay Alison Riske-Amritraj #105 2-6 7-5 1-0 (ret.) Sorana Cirstea #45 Match data
Jan 22, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Sorana Cirstea #78 6-2 7-6(2) Alison Riske-Amritraj #42 Match data
Jan 31, 2014* Pattaya WTA 250 R16 Hard Sorana Cirstea #23 6-3 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #47 Match data
Jul 29, 2013 Washington WTA 250 R16 Hard Sorana Cirstea #28 3-6 6-2 6-3 Alison Riske-Amritraj #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4