H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 4-4

Sorana Cirstea and Jelena Jankovic are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Sorana Cirstea leads 3–1 on clay, while Jelena Jankovic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2016 Mallorca quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 2016* Mallorca WTA 250 QF Grass Jelena Jankovic #25 6-3 6-3 Sorana Cirstea #97 Match data
May 2, 2016 Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sorana Cirstea #127 6-4 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #24 Match data
Jun 1, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jelena Jankovic #7 6-1 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #26 Match data
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sorana Cirstea #27 6-3 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #14 Match data
Mar 22, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #24 6-0 6-4 Sorana Cirstea #27 Match data
Aug 25, 2012* Dallas WTA 250 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #34 6-2 6-1 Sorana Cirstea #38 Match data
May 16, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sorana Cirstea #45 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) Jelena Jankovic #20 Match data
Jun 2, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Sorana Cirstea #41 3-6 6-0 9-7 Jelena Jankovic #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Jelena Jankovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4