H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 1-5

Lucie Safarova holds a 5–1 lead over Sorana Cirstea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2018 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sorana Cirstea
ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #29 6-2 6-4 Sorana Cirstea #36 Match data
Aug 6, 2014* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #17 6-4 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #36 Match data
Apr 5, 2013* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Lucie Safarova #19 6-3 5-7 6-1 Sorana Cirstea #25 Match data
Oct 15, 2011* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Lucie Safarova #27 7-5 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #78 Match data
Aug 27, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sorana Cirstea #53 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lucie Safarova #58 Match data
Mar 25, 2008* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Lucie Safarova #39 6-1 7-5 Sorana Cirstea #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4 — — — — — — —