H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Sorana Cirstea vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-0
Sorana Cirstea holds a 2–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sorana Cirstea leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sorana Cirstea won the 2011 Linz third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 7-5 6-3 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Oct 13, 2011* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard |
| Sorana Cirstea | 6-4 7-6(6) | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Apr 15, 2010* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 346 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sorana Cirstea | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2008 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #17 | 1,957 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |