H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Stacey Martin vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 0-1

Meredith Mcgrath holds a 1–0 lead over Stacey Martin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meredith Mcgrath leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1990 Oakland round of 32 6-1 7-5.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meredith Mcgrath #57 6-1 7-5 Stacey Martin Match data Nov 1, 1990* R32 Oakland Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stacey Martin 1,677 37 59 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stacey Martin Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
17 1988 6–6 50.0% 1,560 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1989 10–13 43.5% 1,613 0 0 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,516 0 0
19 1990 11–18 37.9% 1,575 0 0 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1991 8–15 34.8% 1,552 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1992 2–5 28.6% 1,528 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,515 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
27 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stacey Martin Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1988 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1991 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1998 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 25 36 61 41.0% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stacey Martin Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1491 97.9 0.0% -4.00 +0.06
17 1988 1561 115.3 +34 48.0% -0.28 1–0 0–1 +0.49 1988 1497 107.2 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 -0.10
18 1989 1613 127.6 +14 -79 45.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–1 -0.27 1989 1517 113.0 +50 +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 +0.67
19 1990 1575 118.2 -3 -19 42.6% -0.47 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.9 +0.10 1990 1709 138.3 +2 -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 1991 1552 114.5 -11 +2 38.3% -0.83 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.7 +0.49 1991 1679 124.7 +46 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 +0.42
21 1992 1528 91.6 -2 +13 21.4% -2.36 1–1 +0.30 1992 1658 94.3 0.0% -4.00 +0.08
22 1993 1516 98.7 33.3% -2.67 0–1 -0.04 1993 1708 131.5 -20 -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 1994 1768 146.2 -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 1995 1742 142.5 +5 -174 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) -0.72
25 1996 1917 143.6 -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
27 1998 1895 99.5 40.0% -0.60 1–0 +0.03
Career 1678 119.8 +6 -21 41.1% -0.68 12–16 (43%) 3–9 (25%) 94.6 +1.20 1928 144.8 -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.