H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Stacy Margolin vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 2-0
Stacy Margolin holds a 2–0 lead over Kay Mcdaniel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stacy Margolin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stacy Margolin won the 1980 Boston third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1980* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stacy Margolin | 6-3 6-2 | Kay Mcdaniel | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1978* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Stacy Margolin | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | Kay Mcdaniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kay Mcdaniel | — | — | — | 1,653 | 18 | 40 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stacy Margolin | Kay Mcdaniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |