H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Steffi Graf vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-0

Steffi Graf holds a 1–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steffi Graf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1985 Roland Garros round of 64 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steffi Graf #14 6-0 6-4 Grace Kim Match data May 30, 1985* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steffi Graf — #1 5,028 2,604 876 110 88.8% 22 1 15 5 36 28 107
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steffi Graf Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
13 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,546 0 0 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,586 0 1
15 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,748 0 0 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,592 0 1
16 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,039 0 0 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,322 0 8 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1988 73–3 96.1% #1 2,540 5 30 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,588 8 44 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,512 9 54 — — — — — — —
22 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,420 10 61 — — — — — — —
23 1992 66–7 90.4% #2 2,434 11 69 — — — — — — —
24 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,506 14 79 — — — — — — —
25 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,415 15 86 — — — — — — —
26 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,464 18 95 — — — — — — —
27 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,475 21 102 — — — — — — —
28 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,400 21 103 — — — — — — —
29 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,305 21 106 — — — — — — —
30 1999 34–9 79.1% — 2,242 22 107 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steffi Graf Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 1982 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1985 19 6 25 76.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1986 20 3 23 87.0% 24 1 25 96.0% — — — — 19 2 21 90.5% 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1987 23 1 24 95.8% 32 0 32 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 9 0 9 100.0% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1988 39 1 40 97.5% 20 1 21 95.2% 7 0 7 100.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1989 39 0 39 100.0% 25 2 27 92.6% 7 0 7 100.0% 14 0 14 100.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 23 1 24 95.8% 20 2 22 90.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 22 4 26 84.6% 19 2 21 90.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 13 2 15 86.7% 25 3 28 89.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 21 2 23 91.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 33 2 35 94.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 38 2 40 95.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 22 1 23 95.7% 11 0 11 100.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 21 1 22 95.5% 14 1 15 93.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 3 1 4 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 15 5 20 75.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 39 389 90.0% 267 32 299 89.3% 84 14 98 85.7% 175 25 200 87.5% — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steffi Graf Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 1981 1502 99.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 1982 1507 121.7 — — — — — +26 — 38.5% -0.62 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1983 1546 109.1 — — — — +59 +52 +29 48.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.36 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.40
15 1984 1749 139.7 — — — — -69 -81 -29 51.4% +0.26 9–3 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 111.2 -0.28 1983 1592 116.1 — — — — +64 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 1985 2039 163.2 — — — — -73 -131 -290 69.6% +1.45 9–4 (69%) 10–3 (77%) 110.8 -2.87 1984 1622 113.9 — — — — +26 — +20 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.34
17 1986 2323 176.8 — — — — -62 -129 — 80.5% +2.45 17–3 (85%) 6–7 (46%) 110.8 -5.74 1985 1695 125.4 — — — — +51 -205 -136 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.71
18 1987 2506 181.5 — — — — -49 -85 -638 90.8% +3.42 9–0 (100%) 3–3 (50%) 107.5 -5.08 1986 1606 117.9 — — — — +47 -127 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 +0.14
19 1988 2540 181.5 — — — — -7 -92 -529 91.8% +3.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -2.00 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +46 — -16 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.11
20 1989 2589 183.5 — — — — +30 -141 -494 93.4% +3.80 7–2 (78%) 2–2 (50%) 102.4 -1.57 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1990 2513 179.0 — — — — +88 -53 -325 89.0% +3.13 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 2420 177.2 — — — — +73 +84 -183 86.8% +3.10 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 92.3 -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 2435 179.0 — — — — +25 +66 -42 82.0% +2.69 16–5 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 2506 183.0 — — — — -28 +45 -108 86.5% +2.91 13–3 (81%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -3.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 2415 179.9 — — — — +25 +40 — 86.0% +3.10 7–3 (70%) 3–7 (30%) 93.7 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 2465 178.3 — — — — +7 +52 -59 87.4% +2.78 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 2475 176.2 — — — — -5 +55 +64 89.5% +2.71 6–1 (86%) 8–2 (80%) 104.0 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 2400 149.2 — — — — +38 +70 — 75.0% +1.65 4–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 2305 172.9 — — — — +58 — +166 74.5% +2.06 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 98.2 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 2243 171.2 — — — — -4 +219 +172 70.7% +1.82 13–4 (76%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2604 181.8 — — — — +8 -20 -151 83.0% +2.71 147–45 (77%) 78–58 (57%) 106.9 -3.00 — 1706 119.2 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.