H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Steffi Graf vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 7-0

Steffi Graf holds a 7–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1996 Wimbledon semifinal 6-2 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 7, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Steffi Graf #1 6-2 2-6 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 26, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 QF Hard Steffi Graf #1 7-6 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 23, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 F Hard Steffi Graf #2 6-1 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 16, 1994* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 QF Hard Steffi Graf #1 6-1 6-1 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 30, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Steffi Graf #1 6-3 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Feb 5, 1993* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Steffi Graf #2 6-1 7-5 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 17, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Steffi Graf #2 7-6 5-7 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,600 866 109 88.8% 22 17 5 12 50 106
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steffi Graf Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
13 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,747 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,037 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,329 0 8 — — — — — — —
18 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1988 68–3 95.8% #1 2,535 5 29 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,584 8 43 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,510 9 53 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,418 10 60 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1992 61–6 91.0% #2 2,448 11 68 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,510 14 78 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,417 15 85 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,466 18 94 — — — — — — —
27 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,446 21 101 — — — — — — —
28 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,353 21 102 — — — — — — —
29 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,284 21 105 — — — — — — —
30 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 106 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8