H2H data updated: 2026-10-24 00:00 UTC

Steffi Graf vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 8-2

Steffi Graf holds an 8–2 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 5–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1995 Philadelphia final 6-1 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
8 – 2
10 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steffi Graf #1 6-1 4-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #63 Match data Nov 12, 1995* F Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #22 7-5 7-6 Steffi Graf #1 Match data Jun 22, 1994* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lori Mcneil #18 7-6 6-4 Steffi Graf #2 Match data Nov 16, 1992 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Steffi Graf #2 6-0 6-2 Lori Mcneil #17 Match data Oct 25, 1992* QF Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Steffi Graf #2 7-5 6-2 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data Oct 27, 1991* QF Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Steffi Graf #1 7-5 6-3 Lori Mcneil #34 Match data Aug 3, 1990* R16 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-2 5-7 6-4 Lori Mcneil #12 Match data Oct 30, 1988* SF Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Steffi Graf #1 6-7 6-1 6-1 Lori Mcneil #10 Match data Mar 5, 1988* SF San Antonio WTA 250 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 4-6 6-2 6-4 Lori Mcneil #12 Match data Sep 13, 1987* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Steffi Graf #3 7-5 4-6 6-2 Lori Mcneil #14 Match data Nov 17, 1986 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,604 876 110 88.8% 22 1 15 5 36 28 107
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steffi Graf Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
13 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,748 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,039 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,322 0 8 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1988 73–3 96.1% #1 2,540 5 30 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,588 8 44 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,512 9 54 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,420 10 61 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1992 66–7 90.4% #2 2,434 11 69 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,506 14 79 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,415 15 86 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,464 18 95 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,475 21 102 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,400 21 103 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,305 21 106 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 107 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steffi Graf Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 1982 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1985 19 6 25 76.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 20 3 23 87.0% 24 1 25 96.0% — — — — 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 23 1 24 95.8% 32 0 32 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 9 0 9 100.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 39 1 40 97.5% 20 1 21 95.2% 7 0 7 100.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 39 0 39 100.0% 25 2 27 92.6% 7 0 7 100.0% 14 0 14 100.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 23 1 24 95.8% 20 2 22 90.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1991 22 4 26 84.6% 19 2 21 90.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1992 13 2 15 86.7% 25 3 28 89.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 21 2 23 91.3% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1993 33 2 35 94.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1994 38 2 40 95.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1995 22 1 23 95.7% 11 0 11 100.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1996 21 1 22 95.5% 14 1 15 93.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1997 3 1 4 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1998 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1999 15 5 20 75.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 39 389 90.0% 267 32 299 89.3% 84 14 98 85.7% 175 25 200 87.5% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steffi Graf Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 1981 1502 99.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 1982 1507 121.7 — — — — — +26 — 38.5% -0.62 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1983 1546 109.1 — — — — +59 +52 +29 48.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1984 1749 139.7 — — — — -69 -81 -29 51.4% +0.26 9–3 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 111.2 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1985 2039 163.2 — — — — -73 -131 -290 69.6% +1.45 9–4 (69%) 10–3 (77%) 110.8 -2.87 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1986 2323 176.8 — — — — -62 -129 — 80.5% +2.45 17–3 (85%) 6–7 (46%) 110.8 -5.74 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1987 2506 181.5 — — — — -49 -85 -638 90.8% +3.42 9–0 (100%) 3–3 (50%) 107.5 -5.08 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1988 2540 181.5 — — — — -7 -92 -529 91.8% +3.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -2.00 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1989 2589 183.5 — — — — +30 -141 -494 93.4% +3.80 7–2 (78%) 2–2 (50%) 102.4 -1.57 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1990 2513 179.0 — — — — +88 -53 -325 89.0% +3.13 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 -0.44 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1991 2420 177.2 — — — — +73 +84 -183 86.8% +3.10 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 92.3 -0.99 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1992 2435 179.0 — — — — +25 +66 -42 82.0% +2.69 16–5 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 -1.85 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1993 2506 183.0 — — — — -28 +45 -108 86.5% +2.91 13–3 (81%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -3.07 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1994 2415 179.9 — — — — +25 +40 — 86.0% +3.10 7–3 (70%) 3–7 (30%) 93.7 -1.05 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1995 2465 178.3 — — — — +7 +52 -59 87.4% +2.78 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.58 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1996 2475 176.2 — — — — -5 +55 +64 89.5% +2.71 6–1 (86%) 8–2 (80%) 104.0 -1.13 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1997 2400 149.2 — — — — +38 +70 — 75.0% +1.65 4–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — 0.00 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1998 2305 172.9 — — — — +58 — +166 74.5% +2.06 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 98.2 -1.13 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 1999 2243 171.2 — — — — -4 +219 +172 70.7% +1.82 13–4 (76%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -2.55 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2604 181.8 — — — — +8 -20 -151 83.0% +2.71 147–45 (77%) 78–58 (57%) 106.9 -3.00 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.