H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Stephanie Defina vs Victoria Rogers H2H: 1-1

Stephanie Defina and Victoria Rogers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Defina leads 1–0 on clay, while Victoria Rogers leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Rogers won the 1968 Chestnut Hill round of 32 7-5 6-2.

H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Rogers 7-5 6-2 Stephanie Defina Match data Aug 22, 1968* R32 Chestnut Hill WTA 250 Grass
Stephanie Defina 2-6 6-1 6-3 Victoria Rogers Match data Jul 20, 1968* QF Milwaukee WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stephanie Defina 1,818 93 62 60.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Victoria Rogers 1,739 40 25 61.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stephanie Defina Victoria Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 37–22 62.7% 1,702 0 0
19 1969 3–3 50.0% 1,704 0 0
22 1968 33–22 60.0% 1,678 0 1
23 1969 25–9 73.5% 1,760 0 5
24 1970 33–17 66.0% 1,788 0 7
25 1971 1–9 10.0% 1,706 0 7
26 1972 1–2 33.3% 1,713 0 7
27 1973 0–2 0.0% 1,685 0 7
28 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,674 0 7

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stephanie Defina Victoria Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1968 1703 119.4 -231 -131 +102 60.9% +0.72 8–7 (53%) -1.44
19 1969 1705 112.9 -143 46.2% -0.39 1–0 -0.48
22 1968 1678 117.2 -196 +95 -126 56.8% +0.45 13–9 (59%) -1.36
23 1969 1761 138.3 -91 +61 71.6% +1.86 3–3 (50%) +0.05
24 1970 1789 133.4 -88 +98 -231 62.9% +1.05 7–4 (64%) 1–0 +0.80
25 1971 1707 111.7 -58 10.0% -2.90 -0.83
26 1972 1714 107.0 33.3% -1.83 1–0 -0.95
27 1973 1686 100.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.40
28 1974 1675 102.4 0.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.06
Career 1819 129.6 -120 +87 -145 57.7% +0.65 23–16 (59%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 -1.80 1740 118.2 -193 -131 +102 59.6% +0.62 9–7 (56%) -2.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.