H2H data updated: 2026-10-24 00:00 UTC

Stephanie Rehe vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-0

Stephanie Rehe holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Rehe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1988 Mahwah round of 16 7-6 3-6 6-1.

USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephanie Rehe #18 7-6 3-6 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #19 Match data Aug 26, 1988* R16 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,005 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stephanie Rehe Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
13 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,824 0 2 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,867 0 3 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,971 0 5 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,972 0 5 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,747 0 2
21 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,768 0 5 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,746 0 5 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,759 0 5 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 — — — — — — — 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 — — — — — — — 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 — — — — — — — 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 — — — — — — — 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,841 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stephanie Rehe Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1986 15 8 23 65.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1987 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1988 33 14 47 70.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1992 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1993 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 89 52 141 63.1% 12 17 29 41.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 28 21 49 57.1% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stephanie Rehe Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
11 1981 1502 97.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 1983 1472 101.2 — — — — — +54 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1984 1461 107.6 — — — — +97 — — 33.3% -1.27 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1985 1806 137.7 — — — — +29 — -204 66.2% +1.22 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1986 1824 143.9 — — — — +5 -243 — 59.8% +0.59 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 99.5 +0.29 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06
17 1987 1868 140.6 — — — — +24 -213 — 66.7% +0.83 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.9 -0.87 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.59
18 1988 1971 150.4 — — — — +36 -321 -361 63.4% +0.84 16–4 (80%) 9–7 (56%) 109.5 +1.74 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1652 123.4 — — — — +48 -80 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +1.93
20 1990 1972 150.5 — — — — +13 — — 48.4% -0.35 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -2.64 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -81 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.73
21 1991 1769 119.9 — — — — +127 -165 -190 37.5% -0.45 1–5 (17%) 1–7 (13%) 88.2 +0.02 1986 1633 120.1 — — — — -64 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.35
22 1992 1746 139.7 — — — — +45 — — 44.0% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.1 -2.65 1987 1860 148.2 — — — — -142 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +1.29
23 1993 1759 118.2 — — — — +25 — — 70.0% +2.00 1–1 — — -0.09 1988 1844 145.8 — — — — -150 +156 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.39
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -133 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.83
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1815 140.6 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -137 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +132 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +16 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 2006 148.5 — — — — +33 -192 -247 57.2% +0.47 39–35 (53%) 27–34 (44%) 96.5 -1.48 — 1937 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +3.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.