H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Sue Barker vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-9

Andrea Jaeger holds a 9–0 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 5–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Canadian Open round of 16 6-0 6-0.

GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 9
9 main-draw meetings
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-0 6-0 Sue Barker Match data Aug 19, 1983* R16 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 6-1 Sue Barker Match data Jul 28, 1983 RR Sydney Indoors WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 7-5 Sue Barker Match data Dec 9, 1981* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-7 6-2 Sue Barker Match data Aug 8, 1981* QF Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 7-5 6-2 Sue Barker Match data Mar 5, 1981* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 3-6 6-0 6-1 Sue Barker Match data Feb 14, 1981* QF Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 1-6 6-0 Sue Barker Match data May 4, 1980* QF Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 6-2 Sue Barker Match data Feb 22, 1980* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-3 Sue Barker Match data Feb 2, 1980* QF Seattle WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Barker — #5 — 2,267 381 218 63.6% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5
16 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,542 0 0 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8
17 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,569 0 1 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10
18 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,764 0 6 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11
19 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,969 0 11 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11
20 1976 64–24 72.7% #10 2,066 1 14 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11
21 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,147 1 16 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11
22 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,939 1 17 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11
23 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,023 1 20 — — — — — — —
24 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,933 1 20 — — — — — — —
25 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,960 1 21 — — — — — — —
26 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,805 1 21 — — — — — — —
27 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,751 1 22 — — — — — — —
28 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,556 1 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Barker Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1970 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1971 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1%
16 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 21 11 32 65.6% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1977 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 30 6 36 83.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1978 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1979 12 6 18 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 39 81 51.9% 70 36 106 66.0% 133 64 197 67.5% 113 75 188 60.1% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Barker Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1514 108.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.03 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 1971 1526 105.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.11 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95
16 1972 1542 113.2 — — — — — — +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +1.43 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51
17 1973 1569 110.1 — — — — — -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) — — +1.91 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79
18 1974 1765 135.9 — — — — -151 -87 -20 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.57 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08
19 1975 1970 154.9 — — — — -139 -87 -17 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.83 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43
20 1976 2066 161.7 — — — — -35 -14 -14 67.5% +1.28 17–7 (71%) 6–7 (46%) 109.5 -5.34 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48
21 1977 2147 167.3 — — — — +152 -97 -84 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.84 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1978 1939 142.4 — — — — +44 — +80 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -0.92 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19
23 1979 2024 162.7 — — — — +45 -16 +21 66.7% +1.18 9–12 (43%) 8–5 (62%) 93.0 -4.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 1933 146.3 — — — — +32 — +99 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 1960 149.6 — — — — +22 -1 +63 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1806 134.4 — — — — +61 +88 +84 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — -3.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 1752 133.0 — — — — +75 +55 +124 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1556 94.2 — — — — +108 +139 +247 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2268 155.9 — — — — +36 -26 +22 61.7% +0.84 83–64 (56%) 63–38 (62%) 106.4 -3.37 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.