H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Sue Barker vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-0

Sue Barker holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1982 Brighton round of 32 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sue Barker
GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Barker 4-6 6-4 6-4 Andrea Temesvari Match data Oct 28, 1982* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Barker — #5 — 2,267 381 218 63.6% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,542 0 0 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1
17 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,569 0 1 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4
18 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,764 0 6 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,969 0 11 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5
20 1976 64–24 72.7% #10 2,066 1 14 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5
21 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,147 1 16 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5
22 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,939 1 17 — — — — — — —
23 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,023 1 20 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,933 1 20 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
25 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,960 1 21 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,805 1 21 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,751 1 22 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,556 1 22 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Barker Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1970 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1971 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 21 11 32 65.6% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1977 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 30 6 36 83.3% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1978 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 12 6 18 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 15 10 25 60.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 39 81 51.9% 70 36 106 66.0% 133 64 197 67.5% 113 75 188 60.1% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Barker Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1514 108.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1971 1526 105.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.11 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16
16 1972 1542 113.2 — — — — — — +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +1.43 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02
17 1973 1569 110.1 — — — — — -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) — — +1.91 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39
18 1974 1765 135.9 — — — — -151 -87 -20 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.57 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45
19 1975 1970 154.9 — — — — -139 -87 -17 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.83 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41
20 1976 2066 161.7 — — — — -35 -14 -14 67.5% +1.28 17–7 (71%) 6–7 (46%) 109.5 -5.34 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74
21 1977 2147 167.3 — — — — +152 -97 -84 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.84 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1978 1939 142.4 — — — — +44 — +80 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 2024 162.7 — — — — +45 -16 +21 66.7% +1.18 9–12 (43%) 8–5 (62%) 93.0 -4.16 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31
24 1980 1933 146.3 — — — — +32 — +99 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 -0.03 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1981 1960 149.6 — — — — +22 -1 +63 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.75 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1982 1806 134.4 — — — — +61 +88 +84 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — -3.24 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26
27 1983 1752 133.0 — — — — +75 +55 +124 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.23 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 1984 1556 94.2 — — — — +108 +139 +247 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.88 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 2268 155.9 — — — — +36 -26 +22 61.7% +0.84 83–64 (56%) 63–38 (62%) 106.4 -3.37 — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.