H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sue Barker vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 1-2
Betty Ann Grubb holds a 2–1 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Betty Ann Grubb leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betty Ann Grubb won the 1980 Wimbledon second round 3-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1980* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Betty Ann Grubb | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1979* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-0 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1975* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Betty Ann Grubb | 7-5 1-0 (ret.) | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sue Barker | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |